FluenticOS
How it works Integration & AI Advantages Built for Request early access
Lab operations platform

The lab that schedules itself.

FluenticOS connects your instruments, your protocols, and your team into one live, audit-ready system. Experiments plan, run, trace, and report themselves, end to end.

Built for hospital, academic, translational, and clinical research labs.

Live schedule
executing planned completed
Incubator B2
Imager A
Liquid handler
Plate reader
Relocation
Incubator
Imager
Liquid handler
Plate reader
Relocation
The problem

Right now, your schedule lives in five different places.

Every research lab runs on a patchwork: a protocol in someone's head, a spreadsheet everyone half-trusts, and a different piece of software for every instrument. None of it talks to the others, so a scientist has to, and none of it produces an audit trail on its own.

  • A shared spreadsheet everyone half-trusts
  • A whiteboard for what's running where
  • Separate, disconnected software per instrument
  • Someone walking the bench just to check on a run
  • A scramble to reconstruct who did what before an audit

FluenticOS replaces the patchwork with one system that watches every experiment, every instrument, and every deadline, continuously, and writes a tamper-evident record as it goes.

How it works

Five ideas. One system that never stops watching.

01
Design

Lay out a protocol once in a typed step editor, timing, dependencies, and instrument I/O checked as you build it, then run it across as many experiments as you need.

02
Connect

Incubators, imagers, liquid handlers, and other lab hardware link in through a lightweight edge agent per system, so the platform always knows the true state of every instrument and sample.

03
Orchestrate

A scheduling engine sequences and times every step across every active experiment, like air-traffic control for your lab, so runs never collide.

04
Monitor

A single dashboard shows every experiment, instrument, and sample's status and location, with timelines and ETAs, flagging problems the moment they happen.

05
Trace

Every sample, measurement, and step is tracked end to end in a hash-chained, tamper-evident log, full lineage from source to result, for reproducibility and audit.

Agentic protocol authoring

From a paper's methods section to a running experiment

Paste the paragraph. Watch it become a typed protocol, node by node, then a live schedule.

Pharmacological profiling — microtumor assay
DR
Pull the assay protocol out of this paper for me: Muller et al. · "Adaptive Microtumor Drug-Response Profiling at Scale" · Oncology Protocols, 2026
AI
Searching for the paper, extracting the Materials and Methods section…
Muller et al. · "Adaptive Microtumor Drug-Response Profiling at Scale" · Oncology Protocols, 2026 · Materials and Methods Microtumor GenerationMicrotumors were generated by seeding 800–2000 cells per well into 384-well ultra-low attachment U-bottom plates. Plates were cultured under standard conditions (37 °C, 5% CO₂) for 72 hours to permit complete microtumor formation. Compound Preparation and ControlsCompounds were sourced from pre-formatted plates at standardised concentrations designed to achieve drug-specific Cmax parameters. Staurosporine (1 µM) served as a positive control for cell death; 0.5% DMSO served as the negative vehicle control. Compound TreatmentCompound solutions were prepared at 2× working concentration. Treatment was initiated via 50% volumetric medium exchange (55 µL per well). Microtumors were exposed to compounds for 24–96 hours, after which supernatant was removed and replaced with fresh growth medium. Monitoring and RecoveryMicrotumor proliferation and post-treatment recovery were monitored continuously for up to 14 days. After compound removal, fresh medium was replenished every 2–3 days for the remainder of the monitoring period.
→ physical node → data node → variable node
DR
Turn the parsed steps into a typed, port-checked protocol.
AI
Building the protocol, node by node — 17 in total, one per controls, incubation dwell, and monitoring checkpoint, never reused.
SDSeed
800–2000/well
INIncubate
72h · 37°C
MNMonitor
Baseline
DSDose
Cmax, 2×
DSDose
+ctrl 1µM
DSDose
−ctrl 0.5%
INIncubate
→ chk 1
MNMonitor
chk 1
MDMedium
exchange
INIncubate
→ chk 2
MNMonitor
chk 2
INIncubate
→ chk 3
MNMonitor
chk 3
MDMedium
exchange
INIncubate
→ chk 4
MNMonitor
Day 14 · final
ANAnalyze
recovery
physical data variable
DR
Build a compound panel for an NSCLC indication screen.
AI
Searching indication-matched compounds and literature dose ranges for NSCLC — 106 hits across EGFR, ALK, and MEK inhibitor classes.
Osimertinib 1 µM Crizotinib 1 µM Alectinib 1 µM Trametinib 300 nM Afatinib 1 µM Selumetinib 500 nM +100 more
Compound · one color per triplicate318 wells
+ctrl · Staurosporine 1 µM32 wells
−ctrl · 0.5% DMSO34 wells

106 NSCLC-relevant compounds, each run in triplicate, laid out on the 384-well plate. Controls and every compound's 3 replicate wells land on randomized positions, not a fixed block, so no lane, row, or column carries a systematic bias.

DR
Instantiate the protocol and schedule it now.
AI
Scheduling against everything else already running…
Pharmacological profiling — microtumor assay
executing planned completed
Incubator
Liquid handler
Imager
Compute
Incubator
Liquid handler
Imager
Compute
Integration & AI

Every instrument, one surface. Every AI action, one leash.

Instruments plug in through the same control surface a material-handling system would use. An AI assistant is welcome to drive it, through the exact same door as everyone else.

MHS-style device integration

Every instrument, whether it's a liquid handler, an incubator, or a mobile relocation robot, speaks the same out-of-band control surface: describe, run a procedure, read a live state key, write a setpoint. One path, callable identically from the UI, the REST API, MCP, or an edge-agent script, and validated on every call against the instrument's own self-reported procedure list and safety envelope. Heterogeneous fleets slot in without bespoke glue code per vendor.

device.describe(system) { procedures, min_*/max_* envelope } device.run_procedure("LoadPlate") → validated → dispatched → traced
describerun_procedurereadwrite

Agentic control, on a leash

The built-in assistant doesn't get a side channel: it calls the same policy-checked, event-sourced capabilities a person does, over MCP tool-calling, one registry, no shadow API. Every AI write is checked against your access rules, deferred for a human's approval when it touches something sensitive, like moving a plate, and logged as an action taken on behalf of a specific person. "The AI did it" is never where the audit trail ends.

POST /mcp tools/list 36 tools, one capability registry ai:assistant --actedOnBehalfOf--> user:dr-lin
MCP tool-callingdeny-by-defaulthuman approval gateactedOnBehalfOf
Also inside

A few more things quietly doing the work

Ontology-linked catalog

Compounds, treatments, and conditions linked to the standard vocabularies (OBI, RO, PROV-O) your other systems already speak.

Sample lineage

Every sample, plate, and well traced back through every derivation, pool, split, and transfer, all the way to its source, with a unique accession ID for life.

Reagent registry

Every working reagent traced back to its source lot, concentration, and expiry.

Consumable registry

Every plate, tube, and kit tracked well by well, from the moment it's registered to the moment it's discarded.

Data & screen explorers

Query results like a spreadsheet, plot them like a scientist, and turn a compound screen into viability, Z'-factor, and dose-response fits automatically.

Edge-agent fleet

One lightweight agent per system bridges every instrument to the platform, driver-connected or run by hand, with no single point of failure across the fleet.

Compliance & audit trail

A hash-chained, externally anchored event log; role- and rule-based access control with separation-of-duties and time-boxed break-glass overrides; and one-click FAIR evidence packages (RO-Crate + PROV-JSON) for every project.

Advantages

What changes once the lab runs itself

Less manual coordination

Fewer handoffs between spreadsheets, chat threads, and instrument screens, and fewer errors that come from doing it by hand.

Faster experiment throughput

Continuous, automatic sequencing keeps your work moving instead of waiting on the next person to notice it's ready.

Higher instrument utilization

Every instrument's real capacity is known and booked precisely, so expensive equipment sits idle less often.

Audit-ready by default

A hash-chained, externally anchored event log and full lineage are captured as a byproduct of running the work, not a separate task afterward.

Grows with your lab

Start with a single instrument and expand to a full automated fleet on the same system, without re-platforming.

Works with what you own

Built to connect heterogeneous instrument fleets, no rip-and-replace, no single-vendor lock-in.

Built for

Research labs running real experiments, not just single assays: high-throughput compound screening, longitudinal culture studies, multi-step sample-prep pipelines, and regulated clinical workflows, each with its own instruments, timing, dependencies, and compliance requirements.

Ready to see your lab run itself?

We're onboarding a small number of research labs ahead of general availability.